Stephen Harper Strengthens Canada’s Ties with Violent Regime in Honduras

Tyler Shipley

In Nov. 2009, I stood among thousands of unarmed Hondurans – teachers, students, civil servants – demanding an end to a military coup that had transformed a relatively peaceful country into a brutal police state. As I leaned toward a line of soldiers to take a photo, I felt the butt of a machine gun against my rib cage and understood, in a visceral and embodied way, just how serious the situation had become.

The soldiers guarded the Brazilian embassy, where democratically elected
President Manuel Zelaya was being held captive by the military regime. At the time, around 40 people had been killed in direct state violence, while hundreds more had been terrorized in their homes or in the streets, attacked with batons and bullets, raped and tortured in prisons. Anyone who tried to speak out against the coup was targeted for violence or intimidated by threats.

The coup regime is still in power today and the repression continues unabated; in fact, just three weeks ago, Amnesty International Canada issued an urgent call for support for some 114 families targeted by intense police violence in northern Honduras.

But on Aug. 12, 2011, Prime Minister Stephen Harper visited Honduras to congratulate its leaders on a successful return to democracy and respect for human rights.

It may seem like a contradiction, but this is the new Canada. Not only has the Harper government been the strongest supporter of the military regime since the Jun. 2009 coup, we have also successfully negotiated new trade agreements with it and recently announced that we would be sending 150 Canadian soldiers to conduct joint military exercises with the same military that carried out the coup and has overseen some 200 politically motivated assassinations in just over two years.

The horrific stories start to blur together. Beloved teacher Jose Manuel Flores, shot to death at the school where he taught with his students – a response to his activism in the National Teachers’ Federation. Carlos H. Reyes, former presidential candidate, bludgeoned in the head by police. Enrique Gudiel, a critical journalist from Danli, discovering his 17-year-old daughter hanged to her death.

Honduran human rights organizations have meticulously documented the crimes of the military regime and time and time again have begged the international community to take heed, isolate the regime, and force them to step down and allow civilian rule once more.

But Canada has taken the lead in willfully ignoring these groups.

In 2009, the leaders of the coup held fraudulent ‘elections’ in an attempt to legitimize their rule. Every reputable international observation group in the world refused to participate in the sham. Nonetheless, independent conservative US and Canadian groups came to Honduras and declared the elections ‘free and fair,’ all the while refusing to speak with delegations from Honduran civil society who wanted to present evidence on the widespread repression. I confronted one such observer, Edward Fox, about his refusal to pay attention to the human rights organizations and he replied, “I’ve spoken to the US ambassador, and he’s here all the time.”

Indeed. The United States has a long history of meddling in this country; it was nicknamed the USS Honduras in the 1980s, and from its bases in Honduras, the United States launched some of its most brutal and violent wars in Central America. As Honduras has slid back into the chaotic violence characteristic of the 1980s, many Hondurans have suggested that Canada is taking on the role the US used to play; as one woman put it, we are “more gringo than the gringos.”

Kidnapping an elected president and putting an entire nation in lockdown fits the definition of ‘coup d’etat’ to a T. But Canada’s statements have carefully softened the severity of the violence, euphemistically calling it a ‘political crisis’ and routinely ‘calling on all sides’ of the dispute to exercise restraint, as if this were a matter of two equally powerful parties struggling for control. We ‘congratulated’ Honduras on its fraudulent elections (of which up to 70% of Hondurans boycotted in defiance) and regularly praised victorious coup president Pepe Lobo on his ‘steps toward reconciliation’ while the violence continued unabated.

Canadian Minister of State Peter Kent held meetings with Lobo and worked tirelessly to bring Honduras back into the international community, even sending a Canadian diplomat to sit on a ‘Truth Commission’ in 2010 which looked, frankly, farcical to Hondurans who continued to be targeted by police and military on a daily basis.

A shameful record, indeed. But if supporting a miserable gang of thugs like the one ruling Honduras seems un-Canadian, it may be time to look a bit closer in the mirror, and re-examine some of our assumptions about Canada’s behaviour in the world.

Our decade-long occupation of Afghanistan has left over 10,000 civilian casualties, utter social and political ruin, widespread allegations of torture, and no improvement in the much-maligned conditions for women whom we claimed to represent.

Our decision to send the Canadian military to overthrow the democratically elected president of Haiti in 2004 ushered in an era of political instability and disarray that drove the country into ever-deeper poverty and dislocation, making it tragically and immeasurably more vulnerable to the devastating earthquake in 2010.

Our quiet participation in the quagmire in Iraq ought to be a skeleton in the closet, but it is ignored perhaps because we are now actively dropping bombs on Libya, though it doesn’t appear to be doing much good for ordinary Libyans.

As Stephen Harper prepares to heap praise on the leader of a brutal and illegal government in Honduras this Friday, we might ask who in Canada is benefiting from our relationship with this regime. Certainly the Canadian mining and garment giants, from Goldcorp to Gildan, which exploit Hondurans’ weakness under such a repressive state apparatus.

But surely not those of us who may have been born in Canada but consider ourselves global citizens. For those of us who believe democracy, security, and human freedom and dignity are more than just euphemisms, it must be time to take responsibility for the Canadian governments’ actions and to insist that they change.

Tyler Shipley is a writer and researcher who teaches at York University in Toronto.

Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug Protects Watershed, sets Consultation Protocol through Referendum

Land and Environment Unit Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug

Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug (KI) voted overwhelmingly in favour of protecting our entire watershed from all industry activity, and approving KI Consultation Protocol that sets out how KI consent will be given prior to any decision being made affecting our KI’s lands and resources.

KI citizens voted in the community custom- based referendum with over 96% of ballots cast in favour of the KI Watershed and the KI Consultation Protocol, according to first count results. The two documents will now be brought into force by KI Chief and Council through a Band Council Resolution along with a spiritual ceremony and blessings of the results. The documents will become part of KI’s Indigenous laws, and KI calls on outside governments and corporations to recognize and respect them. “The KI Watershed Declaration and the KI Consultation Protocol will give us a new mandate to foster dialogue with governments and corporations and as well as open up new opportunities in the areas of economic development, environmental sustainability, and off-reserve issues,” said Chief Donny Morris.

The KI Watershed Declaration applies to a vast 13,025 square kilometer area of lakes, rivers, forest, and wetlands in KI Homeland including 661 square kilometer Big Trout Lake.

It states: “We declare all water that flows into and out of Big Trout Lake, and all lands whose water flow into those lakes, rivers, and wetlands, to be completely protected through our continued care under KI’s authority, laws and protocols…No industrial uses, or other uses which disrupt, poison, or otherwise harm our relationship to these lands and waters will be permitted.”

Activities affecting KI’s lands and resources must only proceed with KI’s free, prior, and informed consent. The Consultation Protocol sets out how KI consent will be given freely, where KI is fully informed of the consequences, prior to any decision-making made, and according to KI’s own laws and decision-making processes.

Six KI leaders including Chief Morris were jailed in 2008 for preventing Platinex from exploring on our Homeland – activities we feared could contaminate the Big Trout Lake. After massive public outcry, an appeals court released the jailed KI leaders, and in 2009 the province bought out Platinex claims and promised never to develop them without our KI support.

Contact:
John Cutfeet, KI Spokesperson (807) 537-
2054 or (807) 738-0935

For more information go to:
http://www.kitchenuhmaykoosib.com/landsandenvironment/

News in Brief

Evan Johnston

Protests, Sit-ins against Keystone XL Pipeline

People from all across Turtle Island gathered in Washington, DC as part of a two-week series of protests outside the White House against the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline that would carry tar sands oil from Alberta to US oil refineries in the Gulf of Mexico. More than 1,000 activists have been arrested between Aug. 20 and Sept. 3 in one of the largest-ever environmental civil disobedience actions in the US. Acclaimed author and environmentalist Bill McKibben noted on Democracy Now! that the proposed pipeline “goes through some of the most sensitive and beautiful and important agricultural land in [the US]. It crosses the Ogalalla Aquifer, a source of water for 20 million people, one of the great pools of fresh water on the planet.” On Aug. 26, however, the US State Department released its final environmental impact statement in which they claim the pipeline will have “no significant impacts.” A final verdict on the pipeline has yet to be reached but is expected to be announced by the end of 2011.

AFL-CIO Distancing Democratic Party

On Aug. 25, American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organization (AFL-CIO) president Richard Trumka indicated that the AFL-CIO will be distancing themselves from the Democratic Party in the lead-up to 2012 elections. The ALF-CIO, the largest federation of unions in the United States, has traditionally been a significant donor to Democratic Party candidates. According to Trumka, “You’re going to see us give less money to build structures for others, and more of our money will be used to build our own structure.” However, Trumka indicated on Sept. 6 that the ALF-CIO leadership will likely be endorsing Barack Obama for President nonetheless.

European Elite Call for Higher Taxes

Following comments made by American billionaire Warren Buffet in early August that he and other members of his class have “been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress,” members of the European ruling class have also begun to speak out in favour of higher taxes for themselves. In France, 16 top executives and other wealthy individuals have signed a petition that calls on the French elite to make an “exceptional contribution” in order to help pull the economy out of crisis. In Italy, Ferrari chairman Luca Cordero di Montezemolo has described it as “scandalous” to attack the middle class in a recession rather than the elite. Most recently, a group of wealthy Germans calling themselves Vermögende für eine Vermögensabgabe (The Wealthy for a Capital Levy) have pushed for a 5% wealth tax for a two-year period, which they claim will raise £88.5 billion.

Execution Date Set for Troy Davis

The execution of death row inmate Troy Davis has been scheduled for Sept. 21 by the Georgia superior court, despite the uncertainty surrounding his case. Troy Davis was convicted of murdering a white Georgia police officer in 1991, but since then the evidence supporting a guilty verdict has gradually fallen apart. In particular, all but two of the state’s non-police witnesses from the trial have recanted or contradicted their testimony. Amnesty International USA has called on the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles to grant him clemency, emphasizing that there is far too much doubt surrounding his case for them to proceed with execution. An international day of solidarity for Troy Davis is being held on Sept. 16.

Canadian Fighter Jets Bomb Libya

Canadian fighter jets have played a disproportionate role in the NATO-lead bombing campaign in Libya, according to an anonymous NATO source. The National Post reported that “As one of three nations carrying out the bulk of the sometimes- controversial air war, Canada with its aging CF-18 fighters has made a contribution clearly disproportionate to the compact size of its air force.” In fact, the NATO source describes Canada’s contribution as “punch[ing] well above its weight.” The bombing of Libya, which began on Mar. 19 by NATO forces, has claimed the lives of hundreds of innocent civilians, although the exact death toll remains uncertain.

Hundreds Gather to Protest Ford’s Cuts

On Sept. 10, hundreds of people gathered at Dufferin Grove Park in Toronto for a ‘Mass Meeting to Stop Ford’s Cuts.’ Organized by the Toronto Stop The Cuts Network – an alliance of Toronto communities, student, and labour groups – the meeting served to introduce the Toronto Declaration, a document which states that the City of Toronto’s “$774 million dollar budget deficit is an exaggeration and a manufactured crisis that is being used as an excuse to cut services, hike user fees, privatize public services, and lay off workers.” The demands made in the Declaration, which aim to strengthen public services and protect the city’s most vulnerable groups, were generated from surveys done by the Stop the Cuts Network in Toronto’s poorest neighbourhoods. City Hall intends to vote on the proposed cuts on Sept. 26 and 27.

Grassy Narrows Claims Victory: Independent Forestry Audit Finds many “Non-Conformances”

Jon Thompson

The leadership of Asubpeeschoseewagong First Nation (Grassy Narrows) feels warranted in its decade-long opposition to logging in its traditional territory following the release of a forest audit citing “significant issues with management” of the Whiskey Jack Forest.

Aimed at Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada, as well as the Kenora and Red Lake Districts of the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), the KBM Consultants report for the 964,000 hectare forest produced 21 recommendations condemning “non-conformances to a law and/or policy,” including tree cover and reforestation, as well as inaccurate and inadequate efforts in both planning and execution.

“Combined, these factors have led to a steady erosion of a conifer- dominated forest condition to one with significantly more mixed woods at reduced stocking,” the audit reads. “Forest sustainability, as assessed through the Independent Forest Audit Process and Protocol will not be achieved unless corrective measures are immediately taken.”

Grassy Narrows’ deputy chief Randy Fobister said he wasn’t surprised by the revelations in the report. He said the “not sufficient studies” on the land were evident to the naked eye for those driving on the back roads and that the report is proof the company and government cut corners in planning, cutting, and planting.

“If you look towards our peaceful blockade, I think this justifies it,” he said. “All we’re doing is protecting the land. The trees can’t protect themselves so the people who were on the land first, that’s our job. It justifies it to us.”

The audit team points out “fundamental differences” in the viewpoints of the ministry and the First Nation. It expresses the differences “cannot be resolved without the Province setting aside many of the requirements to manage the Whiskey Jack Forest” under existing legislation, further adding its belief that the “forest management planning process did not anticipate, nor was it designed to resolve the type of dispute currently being experienced.”

While three First Nations communities (Whitefish Bay, Wabauskang, and Wabaseemoong) have participated in the 2009-2012 plan for the Whiskey Jack, Grassy Narrows rejected invitations to the Contingency Plan Planning Team. The First Nation is negotiating with the ministry on a “nation-to- nation” basis, according to both Fobister and the Minister of Natural Resources, Linda Jeffrey.

“For myself, I’m satisfied with the way (the audit) was done and where we are now,” Fobister said. “We’re working towards real planning.”

Jeffrey was touring a sawmill near Wabauskang in the eastern Whiskey Jack on Tuesday when the audit was released. While she pointed out the government worked hard with AbitibiBowater before the company surrendered the forest license to the crown in 2009, the management responsibility now lies with the ministry. While she claimed new forest practices have been undertaken since the transfer, she committed to taking the recommendations “very seriously,” in the interest of economic development, jobs, and sustainability.

“Whenever you get an audit, it’s kind of like a report card. There are times you like the results and sometimes you don’t. I’m always looking for an ‘A’ when I get a report card. When some people manage the forest, they don’t necessarily do it the way I want them to do it. It’s my job to get everyone together.”

Her ministry signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Grassy Narrows earlier this year and negotiations will resume on Jul. 27.